Add Family Tree tutorial to demonstrate integration into an application's existing data model #75
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MarkNahabedian
changed the title
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #75 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.46% 93.46%
=======================================
Files 7 7
Lines 306 306
=======================================
Hits 286 286
Misses 20 20 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Thank you for the contribution! I'm going on holiday now but I'll try to review it in early January :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds the tutorial "Family Tree", which demonstrates how MetaGraphsNext.jl can be incorporated into an application's existing data model to provide graph capabilities.
It also modifies the "test" workflow so that it can be manually triggered.
Currently, this test
is commented out of test/runtests.jl because it was failing in a fresh clone.
Including the actual family tree data in the tutorial feels like obfuscatory clutter. It's not obvious given how the test/doc examples are structured how to include an auviliarry data file. Suggestions?